CE
Crescent Energy Co (CRGY)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 2025 delivered strong free cash flow with Operating Cash Flow of $473.1M and Levered Free Cash Flow of $204.5M, underpinned by disciplined capex ($204.8M) and continued Eagle Ford efficiency gains; production averaged 253 Mboe/d with 103 Mbbl/d oil .
- Versus S&P Global consensus, Crescent posted an EPS beat and EBITDA beat but a slight revenue miss: Adjusted/Primary EPS $0.35 vs $0.314* est., EBITDA $479.8M* vs $468.6M* est., Revenue $866.6M vs $877.4M* est. (company revenue actual) . Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Portfolio reshaping advanced: announced ~$3.1B all‑stock acquisition of Vital Energy (Permian) and signed >$700M of non‑core divestitures (Barnett, Rockies, Mid‑Continent) at >5.5x EBITDA; proceeds aimed at debt paydown; borrowing base springing to $3.9B with lower pricing, capturing ~$12M synergies ahead of close .
- 2025 capex guidance was improved for a second straight quarter to $910–$970M (from original $925–$1,025M) with flat production on a divestiture‑adjusted basis; Q3 dividend held at $0.12/share .
- Key near‑term stock catalysts: Vital closing/timing and integration, divestiture closings by year‑end, synergy capture progression, and Q4 mix/volume impacts (≈16 Mboe/d reduction from divestitures; oil ~39%) .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Free cash flow and cost efficiency: $473.1M Operating Cash Flow and $204.5M LFCF despite lower sequential revenue; Eagle Ford D&C and facilities costs per foot down ~15% vs 2024 with higher well productivity .
- Capital structure and liquidity: Borrowing base expanded 50% to $3.9B and pricing reduced (~$12M cost‑of‑capital synergies captured in advance of Vital close) .
- Strategic portfolio actions: >$700M of non‑core divestitures signed at >5.5x EBITDA and at a premium to PV‑10, simplifying the portfolio and improving margin/breakevens; Vital transaction adds scaled Permian exposure . “Our results exceeded expectations on all key metrics, and we are enhancing our full‑year outlook for the second consecutive quarter” — CEO David Rockecharlie .
-
What Went Wrong
- Revenue modestly below consensus: $866.6M actual vs $877.4M* est. despite strong realizations; GAAP net loss of $10.3M given DD&A, impairment, interest expense and debt extinguishment costs . Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Sequential margin drift: Adjusted EBITDAX margin eased to ~56.1% from ~57.2% in Q2 (company measures), reflecting lower revenue and higher per‑Boe LOE/taxes .
- Near‑term headwinds into Q4: CFO guided to ~16 Mboe/d production reduction from divestitures and ~39% oil mix in Q4, which could weigh on oil‑weighted cash flow mix before Vital synergies are realized .
Financial Results
Vs estimates (S&P Global) and actuals
Values retrieved from S&P Global.
P&L and cash flow vs prior periods (oldest → newest)
Commodity revenue breakdown (oldest → newest)
Operating KPIs
Activity
Non‑GAAP reconciliation references for Adjusted EBITDAX, LFCF, and Adjusted EPS are provided in the 8‑K exhibits .
Guidance Changes
Additional context: Borrowing base springing to $3.9B with lower pricing at Vital close; ~$12M synergies already captured .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- Strategic positioning: “Our results exceeded expectations on all key metrics, and we are enhancing our full‑year outlook for the second consecutive quarter… [Vital] establishes Crescent as a top 10 U.S. independent oil and gas producer” — CEO David Rockecharlie .
- Integration plan and synergies: “We plan to… take [Vital] activity down to 1–2 rigs at closing… we now see upside beyond the $90–$100 million of base case synergies we announced” — CEO .
- Capital allocation and balance sheet: “Priorities 1A and 1B are our attractive fixed dividend and maintaining a strong balance sheet… more than $150 million of debt repayment during the quarter… borrowing base… to $3.9 billion… capturing approximately $12 million… ahead of closing” — CFO Brandi Kendall .
- Portfolio streamlining: “> $700 million of accretive divestitures… total sale value more than five and a half times EBITDA and a significant premium to… PV‑10” — CEO .
Q&A Highlights
- Development approach unchanged; scale enables further efficiency, not strategy shifts (pad design, D&C execution) — CEO .
- Deleveraging path: RBL to be repaid by year‑end standalone; divestiture proceeds to pay down Vital RBL; ~$2B liquidity post‑close; focus on reducing notes — CFO .
- Q4 setup: ~16 Mboe/d production headwind from divestitures; oil mix ~39% — CFO .
- Pricing uplift drivers: Better marketing/contracting improved realizations vs guidance/historicals — CFO .
- Costs: Pro forma adjusted operating costs ~$11.50/boe after divestitures/Vital blending; opportunities to improve — CFO .
Estimates Context
- S&P Global consensus vs reported: Revenue $0.877B* est. vs $0.867B actual (miss); Primary/Adjusted EPS $0.314* est. vs $0.35 actual (beat); EBITDA $468.6M* est. vs $479.8M* actual (beat). Values retrieved from S&P Global. Company also reported Adjusted EBITDAX of $486.5M (non‑GAAP) .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Free cash flow machine with improving structural costs: $204.5M LFCF on $204.8M capex and ~56% EBITDAX margin; continued Eagle Ford efficiencies and better marketing enhance durability .
- Accretive portfolio rotation should raise quality and margins: >$700M signed divestitures at >5.5x EBITDA and Vital adds scaled Permian inventory; management intends to run Vital at 1–2 rigs to prioritize FCF and returns .
- Balance sheet flexibility rising: Borrowing base to $3.9B with lower pricing and early synergy capture; pro forma leverage at ~1.4–1.5x provides capacity for deleveraging and selective capital returns .
- Near‑term Q4 optics: Expect ~16 Mboe/d lower volumes and ~39% oil mix from divestitures; Vital close timing and integration cadence are key to 2026 run‑rate .
- Estimate revisions: Expect upward EPS/EBITDA revisions (beat) but potential trimming of near‑term revenue/volume assumptions given Q4 mix/volume commentary. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Execution focus: Track synergy delivery (>$90–$100M base case with upside), realized pricing sustainability, and cost trajectory (target ~$11.50/boe adjusted op cost) .
- Dividend maintained at $0.12/quarter; buyback capacity remains with ~$86M authorization left YTD through Q3 (program capacity context) .
Non‑GAAP note: Adjusted EBITDAX, Levered Free Cash Flow, Adjusted Net Income/EPS are non‑GAAP measures; reconciliations provided in the Q3 8‑K exhibits **[1866175_0001866175-25-000166_crescentenergyq32025earnin.htm:11]** **[1866175_0001866175-25-000166_crescentenergyq32025earnin.htm:12]** **[1866175_0001866175-25-000166_crescentenergyq32025earnin.htm:13]** **[1866175_0001866175-25-000166_crescentenergyq32025earnin.htm:15]**.
Consensus/estimate note: Asterisked values are from S&P Global (Capital IQ). Values retrieved from S&P Global.